Key takeaways
- CMS removed SHIP from the required TPMO disclaimer for 2027. Medicare.gov and 1-800-MEDICARE remain.
- SHIP has not been abolished. It still exists and you can still use it.
- CMS's reasoning: SHIP volunteers may not always have the expertise for increasingly complex MA and Part D programs.
- CMS also cited variation between programs and counsellors producing different answers.
- CMS chose 1-800-MEDICARE for standardised training, nationwide availability, 24/7 access and direct oversight.
- Commission-free is not the same as qualified. Those are different questions.
If you’ve worked with a Medicare agent in the last few years, you’ve probably heard a required disclaimer mentioning SHIP — the State Health Insurance Assistance Program.
For 2027, that’s changing. CMS removed SHIP from the required disclaimer that certain agents and organisations must give beneficiaries.
That doesn’t mean SHIP has been eliminated. It doesn’t mean you can’t use it.
But the reason CMS made this change deserves more attention than it’s getting — because CMS itself raised a question beneficiaries should be asking: who is actually qualified to help you make one of the most important healthcare and financial decisions you’ll make each year?
What is SHIP?
SHIP programs provide free Medicare counselling and education through state and local programs. Many counsellors are volunteers, and they don’t receive insurance commissions for enrolling people in plans.
You’ll often hear SHIP described as a source of “free, unbiased Medicare advice.”
The “free” part is easy to understand. But be careful about assuming that commission-free automatically means more knowledgeable, more accurate or better qualified. Those are completely different questions.
What exactly changed for 2027?
For several years, the required Third-Party Marketing Organization (TPMO) disclaimer has directed beneficiaries to additional sources of information: Medicare.gov, 1-800-MEDICARE and SHIP.
For 2027, CMS removed SHIP from that required disclaimer. Medicare.gov and 1-800-MEDICARE remain.
CMS didn’t abolish SHIP. It decided agents should no longer be federally required to direct every beneficiary to SHIP as part of a standardised disclaimer.
And it explained why.
CMS raised concerns about expertise and consistency
This is the part worth sitting with.
CMS acknowledged that SHIP can provide unbiased information about plan choices. But it also said SHIP volunteers may not always have the expertise necessary to help beneficiaries navigate increasingly complex Medicare Advantage and Part D programs.
CMS further discussed variations among SHIP programs and counsellor training that can result in beneficiaries receiving different information depending on which program or counsellor they reach.
That’s significant, because Medicare isn’t getting simpler. We’re asking people to evaluate provider networks, formularies, drug tiers, prior authorisation, step therapy, maximum out-of-pocket exposure, supplemental benefits, Special Needs Plans, Medigap rules, enrollment periods — and sometimes dozens of plan choices.
Licensed agents have substantial requirements too
This gets lost when agents are described simply as “salespeople.”
Someone selling Medicare Advantage or Part D coverage doesn’t just decide one morning to start giving Medicare advice.
- Agents must be appropriately state licensed
- CMS states agents and brokers must annually complete training and pass testing on Medicare and on health and prescription drug plans
- Organisations must ensure agents are trained and tested annually on Medicare rules and on the specific benefits of the plans they sell
- Plans and TPMOs face additional CMS requirements and oversight
And that’s before the experience an established professional develops working with beneficiaries year after year.
That doesn’t mean every licensed agent is excellent. A licence no more guarantees good judgment than a credential in any other field guarantees every practitioner is equally skilled. But professional qualifications matter.
“They’re volunteers” isn’t enough for me
I have tremendous respect for people who volunteer their time. But volunteering doesn’t itself establish expertise.
If I’m making a decision that could affect which doctors I can see, which hospitals I can use, whether my prescriptions are covered and potentially thousands of dollars — I want to know more than whether the person helping me receives a commission.
I want to know:
- How much Medicare training have you completed?
- How much experience do you have?
- How often do you actually work with these plans?
- Do you understand Medicare Advantage and Medigap?
- Do you understand Part D formularies and drug restrictions?
- Do you understand enrollment periods and guaranteed-issue rights?
- Do you understand the differences among the plans actually available where I live?
Those questions matter.
Think about it another way
Imagine you were facing a complicated medical condition. Would your only question be “which person isn’t paid based on providing my care?”
Of course not. You’d want to know about education, training, credentials, experience and expertise with your particular condition.
The analogy isn’t perfect — SHIP counsellors and agents aren’t medical providers — but the principle holds. When the stakes are high, qualifications matter. Medicare coverage determines access to doctors, hospitals and medications, and exposes you to thousands of dollars in costs.
The qualifications of the person advising you shouldn’t be an afterthought.
My perspective, stated plainly
I’ll be transparent: I’m a Medicare broker. I’ve been licensed in insurance since 2007 and helping people with Medicare since 2010. So yes, I believe there’s significant value in working with an experienced independent professional.
But don’t take that recommendation simply because I say so. Look at what the person you’re considering actually does.
An experienced independent broker can review your situation across multiple types of coverage. That can mean looking at Medicare Advantage, Medigap and Part D. Entering your exact medications, dosages and pharmacies and comparing estimated costs. Checking formularies, tiers, prior authorisation and step therapy. Verifying doctors, specialists and hospitals. Understanding that the cheapest premium isn’t necessarily the least expensive option overall.
And sometimes it means saying: “Don’t change anything. What you have is still your best fit.”
Then there’s what happens after enrollment
This may be the biggest difference of all.
Medicare isn’t a decision you make once and forget. Plans change. Provider contracts change. Formularies change. People move, retire, get new prescriptions. Doctors leave networks. Prior authorisations get denied. Letters arrive that nobody understands.
Our clients don’t see us during Annual Enrollment and disappear for a year. They call us. We’re still here.
That’s part of what insurance companies compensate professional agents to do: service the people we’ve helped enrol.
So when compensation is discussed as though it automatically makes advice inferior, an important part of the conversation is missing. You’re not paying for a transaction. A good agent is building an ongoing professional relationship.
Does this mean every agent beats every SHIP counsellor?
Of course not.
There are undoubtedly extremely knowledgeable SHIP counsellors. There are also agents I wouldn’t send my own family to. The title alone doesn’t tell you enough.
So I wouldn’t say “use an agent because agents are always better.” I’d say:
Choose the most qualified person you can find.
Ask about experience. Ask about training. Ask what kinds of coverage they work with. Ask how many companies they represent. Ask whether they’ll review your prescriptions and providers. Ask what happens when you need help six months after enrollment.
And ask whether they’re willing to tell you not to change plans when changing isn’t in your interest.
Why CMS chose 1-800-MEDICARE instead
For the required disclaimer, CMS decided 1-800-MEDICARE was a more appropriate nationwide resource — pointing to standardised training, nationwide availability, 24/7 access and direct CMS oversight.
That tells us something. CMS wasn’t simply asking whether a resource received commissions. It was weighing training, consistency and oversight.
Those things should matter to you too.
You can still use SHIP
None of this means SHIP has no value. It remains available, and anyone who wants to use it absolutely can. CMS itself acknowledges SHIPs can provide unbiased information about plan choices.
But “free” and “commission-free” should never be confused with a guarantee of expertise. And beneficiaries shouldn’t be made suspicious of professional agents simply because those agents are compensated for their work.
The better question is: who is qualified to help me make this decision correctly?
Frequently asked questions
Did Medicare get rid of SHIP? No. CMS removed SHIP from a required disclaimer. The program still exists and you can still use it.
What is the TPMO disclaimer? A standardised statement certain Medicare marketing organisations must provide, directing beneficiaries to additional information sources.
What’s still in the disclaimer? Medicare.gov and 1-800-MEDICARE.
Why did CMS remove SHIP? It said SHIP volunteers may not always have the expertise for increasingly complex Medicare Advantage and Part D programs, and cited variation in training and consistency between programs.
Does this mean SHIP gives bad advice? No, and that’s not what CMS said. It said expertise and consistency vary — which is a different claim.
Are Medicare agents trained? Yes. Agents must be state licensed, and CMS requires annual training and testing on Medicare and on the specific plans they sell.
Should I use an agent or SHIP? Choose on qualifications rather than label. Ask about training, experience, which products they handle, and what happens after enrollment.
The bottom line
CMS removed SHIP from the mandatory TPMO disclaimer for 2027, and its explanation matters: concerns that volunteers may not always have the expertise to navigate increasingly complicated programs, and that training and consistency vary.
Meanwhile, licensed agents selling Medicare Advantage and Part D coverage face state licensing, annual Medicare training and testing, plan-specific training and marketing requirements.
That doesn’t make every agent excellent. It doesn’t make every SHIP counsellor unqualified. But it does challenge the simplistic idea that volunteer = unbiased expert and commissioned agent = salesperson you shouldn’t trust.
Medicare is too important for labels like that. Look at qualifications. Look at experience. Look at how thoroughly someone reviews your situation. Look at whether they’re available after enrollment.
Looking for experienced Medicare help?
Medicare isn’t something we dabble in during enrollment season. We work with beneficiaries throughout the year — reviewing Medicare Advantage, Medigap and prescription drug coverage, and looking at the pieces that actually matter: doctors, hospitals, prescriptions, costs and your priorities.
And sometimes our recommendation is simple: stay exactly where you are. That’s still advice.
Reach out for a free, no-obligation review or call 904-654-5450. Kate Spilsbury (RSSA®, CMIP®) is an independent, licensed agent based in Jacksonville, serving Northeast Florida and Camden County, GA.
Mere Benefits — Simply For Your Benefit.
This article is educational and not medical, tax, or legal advice, and reflects the author’s professional opinion alongside federal rules as published at the time of writing. Mere Benefits is not connected with or endorsed by the U.S. government or the federal Medicare program. We don’t offer every plan available in your area.
Sources
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — CY 2027 Medicare Advantage and Part D final rule, including the removal of SHIP from the required TPMO disclaimer and the stated reasoning.
- Medicare.gov — Talk to someone
- SHIP National Technical Assistance Center
Questions about your own situation?
Kate can turn this into a specific answer for you — free, and with no pressure.